IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-981-97-9992-3_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Do the Individualized Differences in the Student; Age, Gender, Marital Status, Work Experience, and Educational Qualification Affect FOMO

In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation

Author

Listed:
  • Rekha Mewafarosh

    (Indian Institute of Forest Management)

  • Shivani Agarwal

    (Galgotias University)

  • Vijender Kr Solanki

    (Stanley College of Engineering and Technology for Women)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of demographic variables on Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) among students using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression method. The demographic variables studied include gender, educational qualification, work experience, and marital status. The results indicate significant relationships between these variables and FOMO. Specifically, age and work experience negatively impact FOMO, while gender, educational qualification, and marital status positively influence FOMO. The result of the study suggests that individual demographic factors play a crucial role in shaping FOMO among students. Future research should broaden its scope to include more diverse populations and additional psychological variables to provide a more comprehensive understanding of FOMO.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekha Mewafarosh & Shivani Agarwal & Vijender Kr Solanki, 2025. "Do the Individualized Differences in the Student; Age, Gender, Marital Status, Work Experience, and Educational Qualification Affect FOMO," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Nga Thi Hong Nguyen & José António C. Santos & Vijender Kumar Solanki & Anh Ngoc Mai (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation, pages 81-97, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-97-9992-3_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-9992-3_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-97-9992-3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.