IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-21139-8_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Relevance of Context for Goodwill Impairment Decisions Within Hall’s Framework

In: The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Radu-Daniel Loghin

    (University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Goodwill provides the proverbial canary in the coal mine for financial reporting since any hint of impairment allows financial users to determine conditions of worsening economic conditions, thus enabling a company to thrive within its stakeholder environment. Goodwill impairment decisions require benchmarks, assumptions about growth rates and other subjective elements left to the management’s discretion. All these variables are intertwined with the companies’ cultural framework. This paper tries to investigate the determinants and quality of goodwill impairment decisions within two separate accounting cultures under Hall’s classification of low-context/high-context considering high-context emerging European markets such as Poland and Romania as well as low-context emerging African markets such as South Africa and Zimbabwe in two models, one investigating goodwill impairment decisions with the other focusing on the relevance of goodwill numbers. The findings suggest that cultural context is connected through various proxy variables to goodwill impairment decisions, thus shedding light on a set of novel variables for consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu-Daniel Loghin, 2016. "The Relevance of Context for Goodwill Impairment Decisions Within Hall’s Framework," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Tadeusz Dudycz & Grażyna Osbert-Pociecha & Bogumiła Brycz (ed.), The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency, pages 195-208, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-21139-8_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-21139-8_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.