IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-72494-7_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparative Analysis of the Readiness for Industry 4.0 of Two Multinationals in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Mauricio Resende

    (Federal University of Technology, UTFPR)

  • Vitor Hugo Santos Filho

    (Federal University of Technology, UTFPR)

  • Angelica Bortoluzzi Pereira

    (Federal University of Technology, UTFPR)

  • Camila Mika

    (Federal University of Technology, UTFPR)

Abstract

Given the rapid evolution of the industry and the increasing demands for adaptation and digitalization, it becomes imperative for companies to be prepared for these changes by integrating various technologies and driving changes across different areas of the organization. Understanding the level of readiness is crucial for making informed decisions and ensuring a successful transition to the new industrial paradigm. To this end, this study aimed to analyze how two multinational industries prioritize factors for Industry 4.0 readiness in their strategic planning. To reach this goal, the level of their readiness for Industry 4.0 was measured. The research revealed that large corporations predominantly achieved readiness levels of 4 and 5 on a scale of 1–5 concerning the size of the companies. This underscores the importance of a corporate culture that values innovation, employee training, and a robust strategy for embracing the challenges and opportunities presented by Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Mauricio Resende & Vitor Hugo Santos Filho & Angelica Bortoluzzi Pereira & Camila Mika, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of the Readiness for Industry 4.0 of Two Multinationals in Brazil," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-72494-7_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-72494-7_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-72494-7_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.