IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-72490-9_55.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Proposal of an Acceptability Model for Telerehabilitation Platforms: Perspective of Health Professionals and Patient

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Rubilar

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • José Silva

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • Daniel Gálvez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • Pavlo Santander

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

  • Lorena Delgado

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile)

Abstract

Telerehabilitation platforms are an innovative tool in the health area to support medical centers in their rehabilitation services. Being a recent and widely used tool, it is still evolving, so it is essential to have an evaluation mechanism that allows diagnosing the behavior and reaction of users to this type of platform. This article proposes an acceptance evaluation model based on the identification of the factors that characterize the user's decision to use this type of platform. Assessing this user intention has implications for healthcare centers as it provides support to enhance the design of their platforms.The proposed model is an aid to decision making to improve the user experience with this type of platform and thus improve the remote service.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Rubilar & José Silva & Daniel Gálvez & Pavlo Santander & Lorena Delgado, 2025. "Proposal of an Acceptability Model for Telerehabilitation Platforms: Perspective of Health Professionals and Patient," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-72490-9_55
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-72490-9_55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-72490-9_55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.