Author
Listed:
- Nadezhda N. Pokrovskaia
(Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
Saint-Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia)
- Vitaly A. Mordovets
(Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics)
- Nataly Yu. Kuchieva
(Federal Antimonopoly Service Administration for St. Petersburg)
Abstract
The covid-19 pandemic since February 2020 and energy market crisis since September 2021 have triggered social and political shifts in the conceptual framework that formed the new role of regulation, public engagement and corporate governance in meeting new challenges. The ESG systems have been built around the logic of global investors to value a company in line with a wide range of socially desirable ends, but various forms are observed of the local implementation of the UN SDGs (United Nations sustainable development goals), which are perceived with nuances in various communities. Since the changes of the early 2020s the differences have been reinforced by a new division of responsibilities between essential social actors, the authorities (including local and national State governments, and integration regulatory bodies, such as European regulators) and private business. The ESG logic is now completed with new core components of the ESG-ecosystem, especially, in the energy sector that plays a decisive role in the local infrastructure constructed for activities of population and businesses. This new systemic vision determines the interest of this paper to examine question of the new content of the basic aims and assumptions of the ESG regulation. It was supposed that the ESG ecosystem is a systematic approach, realized in the assessment procedures, evolution of regulation and goal-setting models implemented by the actors of society. The hypotheses were checked with the methodology of case study: for the corporate governance, the cases were investigated in the energy sector and large energy-intensive industry of metals and mining; for regulation, the examples of the UN, EU, Russia and China rules in the field of ESG issues are examined. The distinctive analysis is applied to measure the CO2 impact related to the production and to the consumption, it demonstrates the evolution of the worldwide division of labor and distinguishes the location of carbon-intensive production and consumption in regions. The ESG rules reflect the position of a country as a net producer or net consumer of goods with an important CO2 impact. The investigated corporate governance cases show that the companies in energy sector have not reduced their engagement in the ESG issues and enhanced the ESG policy in the construction of tough ties with local communities and State authorities. These case studies allow researchers to conclude about the new understanding of the ESG ecosystem as a promising conceptual framework to develop a deeper understanding of the corporate and society activities in the purpose to harmonize the economic and social welfare.
Suggested Citation
Nadezhda N. Pokrovskaia & Vitaly A. Mordovets & Nataly Yu. Kuchieva, 2023.
"Regulation of ESG-Ecosystem: Context and Content Evolution: Energy Sector Study,"
Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Anna Rumyantseva & Hod Anyigba & Elena Sintsova & Natalia Vasilenko (ed.), Finance, Economics, and Industry for Sustainable Development, pages 159-179,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-30498-9_15
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30498-9_15
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-30498-9_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.