IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-030-30251-1_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

ESG Risk Perception in Sustainable Financial Decisions. Quantitative Methods Perspective

In: Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Ziolo

    (University of Szczecin)

  • Iwona Bak

    (West Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin)

  • Ria Sinha

    (TERI School of Advanced Studies)

  • Manipadma Datta

    (TERI School of Advanced Studies)

Abstract

The role of ESG risk in both decisions of financial institutions and enterprises is systematically growing. The financial sector is particularly predisposed to the exposure of ESG risk, which is an increasingly important element taken into account in the credit risk management process. Therefore, sustainable financial decisions are those that take into account the ESG risk in the decision-making process. The paper discusses the quantitative methods used in the ESG risk analysis. The critical literature review, induction, and deduction methods were implemented to diagnose the significance of qualitative methods in ESG assessment process. Within the methods enabling the analysis on the financial market, the mathematical, statistical, and econometric methods are of particular use. The results of the study confirmed that usage of quantitative tools in the study of ESG factors is beneficial for the analysis of economic and financial conditions of entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Ziolo & Iwona Bak & Ria Sinha & Manipadma Datta, 2020. "ESG Risk Perception in Sustainable Financial Decisions. Quantitative Methods Perspective," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Kesra Nermend & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska (ed.), Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics, chapter 0, pages 157-172, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-30251-1_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-30251-1_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.