IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-030-23816-2_80.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Worker and Manager Judgements About Factors that Facilitate Knowledge Sharing: Insights from the Brazilian Glass Segment

In: Operations Management for Social Good

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Muniz Jr.

    (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP-FEG))

  • Cleginaldo Carvalho

    (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP-FEG))

  • Vagner Batista Ribeiro

    (Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP-FEG))

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess factors of the tacit knowledge in the glass sector. Its focus is based on the managerial and worker perspectives about better knowledge sharing on the shop floor. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology applied was based on a comprehensive literature review about operation management, knowledge sharing and knowledge management assessment. A review of works relating these topics to the glass and foundry segments was also realized considering documents selected from the Web of Science (1997–2018). The field research work was conducted in the Brazilian glass sector, and the data collecting procedure used was a survey applied to 110 employees selected from the hot glass production line. An exploratory data analysis was performed to capture the employees’ and managers’ perceptions about the studied knowledge sharing factors. Research Questions: The study aims to answer the following research questions: What are the factors for a production system to align people, processes and knowledge? How to assess such factors? What is the importance of these factors in the production managers and workers’ opinion? Findings: The results evidence that, in accordance with the employees’ perceptions, the important factors for the KS are: conversation among the operators and study of work instruction. But it was evidenced that, in accordance with the managers’ perceptions the important factors are: registration in the work instruction and study of work instruction. Research Limitations/Implications: This study was limited to the shop floor context and focused on the blue-collar workers’ perception. The proposed approach can also be applied in other departments or organizations, even considering different cultures, worker groups or production sectors. Practical Implications: The findings support evidences to promote knowledge sharing through the shop floor context in the glass segment, which has a strong dependency on worker tacit knowledge. The work is also aligned with current research gaps identified on the literature. Originality/Value: This paper contributes to increase the understanding of KS to support managers’ actions on practical implications and its implementation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Muniz Jr. & Cleginaldo Carvalho & Vagner Batista Ribeiro, 2020. "Worker and Manager Judgements About Factors that Facilitate Knowledge Sharing: Insights from the Brazilian Glass Segment," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Adriana Leiras & Carlos Alberto González-Calderón & Irineu de Brito Junior & Sebastián Villa & Hugo (ed.), Operations Management for Social Good, chapter 0, pages 809-817, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-23816-2_80
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-23816-2_80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.