IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/perchp/978-981-13-1080-5_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Continuing Representations and Strict Responsibility for Accuracy After Cramaso: Fact or (Legal) Fiction?

In: Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law

Author

Listed:
  • Rick Bigwood

    (University of Queensland)

Abstract

This chapter falls within the theme of this collection broadly under the rubric of reworking established concepts in common law. In fact, the chapter addresses a question not yet definitively answered by common-law courts (although it was recently answered for Scotland, at least at the intermediate appellate level in that jurisdiction): Is an innocently unknown and unsuspected change in the material facts between the making of a (continuing) representation and the representee’s adverse reliance thereon an ‘innocent misrepresentation’? The platform for an inquiry of this nature is the recent decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Cramaso LLP v. Ogilvie-Grant [2014] UKSC 9, which, it seems, still fails to answer, unambiguously, the question above-posed. This chapter argues that the innocently unknown supervening falsification of a continuing representation is not innocent misrepresentation, except by dint of a ‘legal fiction’ device of some sort. It concludes that resorting to legal fiction to render the defendant liable as an innocent misrepresentor in the present circumstances is probably harmless, but only if the fiction invoked is of the ‘assumptive’ rather than ‘assertive’ variety.

Suggested Citation

  • Rick Bigwood, 2018. "Continuing Representations and Strict Responsibility for Accuracy After Cramaso: Fact or (Legal) Fiction?," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, in: Toshiyuki Kono & Mary Hiscock & Arie Reich (ed.), Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law, chapter 0, pages 187-221, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-13-1080-5_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1080-5_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:perchp:978-981-13-1080-5_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.