IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-3-319-25403-6_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing Output and Outcome of Citizen—Government Collaboration on Local Climate Targets

In: Evaluating e-Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Georg Aichholzer

    (Austrian Academy of Sciences)

  • Doris Allhutter

    (Austrian Academy of Sciences)

  • Stefan Strauß

    (Austrian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The e2democracy project applies an integrative framework including an assessment of process, outcome and impacts for a longitudinal evaluation of citizen—government collaboration on local climate targets. This chapter analyzes the relation between project outputs, that is, the supply side of the process such as the quantity and quality of devices and products offered to citizens for information, communication and engagement, and the project outcomes, that is, the immediate effects of the output such as the number and activities of participants and their contributions. The paper first sketches the evaluation framework and specifies the inputs and activities that provided the basic setup for seven local (e-)participation processes before it describes the process output. Against this background eventually the outcome of the citizen—government collaborations including the final evaluation of output and process are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Georg Aichholzer & Doris Allhutter & Stefan Strauß, 2016. "Comparing Output and Outcome of Citizen—Government Collaboration on Local Climate Targets," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Georg Aichholzer & Herbert Kubicek & Lourdes Torres (ed.), Evaluating e-Participation, chapter 9, pages 167-193, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.