IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-3-319-25403-6_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Managers’ View of Participation Processes with Citizen Panels

In: Evaluating e-Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Pina

    (University of Saragossa)

  • Lourdes Torres

    (University of Saragossa)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to evaluate the effectiveness of citizen participation from the organizers’ point of view. We analyze the experience of managers from Germany, Austria, and Spain and their expectations about citizen participation in local government programs through an empirical survey focused on citizen participation in climate change programs. We seek to compare the opinion of these managers, experts in climate change initiatives, about the impact of e-participation. This research will allow us to know the opinion of managers about the success and failure factors of citizen participation in environmental programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Pina & Lourdes Torres, 2016. "The Managers’ View of Participation Processes with Citizen Panels," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Georg Aichholzer & Herbert Kubicek & Lourdes Torres (ed.), Evaluating e-Participation, chapter 14, pages 289-305, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.