IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-3-319-25403-6_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Analyzing Dropout in Long-Term (e-)Collaboration Processes

In: Evaluating e-Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Cimander

    (University of Bremen)

Abstract

The e2democracy project studied citizen panels collaborating with local governments to achieve local climate targets in seven regions in three countries over a period of up to 2 years. Compared to many other participation projects, this is a very long time period and the project examined not only “words„ but also intended changes of behavior. It was therefore a big challenge to maintain the citizens’ participation and to minimize panel dropout. The aim of this chapter is to investigate the extent of dropout during the processes and to understand the reasons behind it. In fact, there were two kinds of dropout. Of 1159 registered panelists at all seven sites, 36 % withdrew before entering any data for the CO2e-monitoring process, a central component of the panels’ activities (dropout 1). A further 27 % dropped out during the subsequent period of up to 2 years (dropout 2), many of them as early as in the first 2–4 months. A survey was undertaken to determine the factors that led to the decision to drop out. The most common reasons were that participation cost too much time and that data collection and entry were not trivial but quite complex tasks. To some extent, the usability of the monitoring instruments employed also caused difficulties. Another critical constant was that many dropouts did not see any possibility of further improving their carbon footprint. Less common reasons were that panelists who dropped out expected no or only relatively low effects on climate protection, did not experience energy savings or were not ready to change their lifestyles.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Cimander, 2016. "Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Analyzing Dropout in Long-Term (e-)Collaboration Processes," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Georg Aichholzer & Herbert Kubicek & Lourdes Torres (ed.), Evaluating e-Participation, chapter 13, pages 265-288, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.