IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/paitcp/978-3-319-25403-6_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Ecological Impact at Individual Level

In: Evaluating e-Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Cimander

    (University of Bremen)

Abstract

There is hardly any valid empirical evidence on whether citizen participation has an impact on the desired objectives. This chapter provides an answer to this question, taking as example seven citizen panels on local climate targets in Austria, Germany, and Spain within the e2democracy (e2d) research project. The citizen panels were part of collaborative (e-)participation processes of citizens and businesses with local governments aimed at reducing carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) by at least 2 % per annum over a period of up to 2 years. After the first year, the majority of panelists in the five Austro-German panels achieved or surpassed the target; in both Spanish panels, less than half did so; after the second year, the percentages of target achievers somewhat declined. So, even though many participants achieved their reduction target, a considerable number of participants did not reach it or reduced their efforts in the second year. Across all seven panels, savings could particularly be achieved in the heating energy and electricity sections. In the fields of nutrition and consumer goods, there were even cases where emissions increased. For the mobility fields of private and public transportation as well as flights, no homogeneous tendencies could be observed among the panels. Overall, even though the size of countable CO2e reductions was not that high, citizen panels were particularly successful in achieving a reconsideration of the panelists’ lifestyles and habits and, to some extent, encouraged effective change processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Cimander, 2016. "Citizen Panels on Climate Targets: Ecological Impact at Individual Level," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Georg Aichholzer & Herbert Kubicek & Lourdes Torres (ed.), Evaluating e-Participation, chapter 11, pages 219-241, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:paitcp:978-3-319-25403-6_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.