IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/oprchp/978-3-642-20009-0_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Bayesian Belief Network Model for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

In: Operations Research Proceedings 2010

Author

Listed:
  • S. Wongthanavasu

    (Khon Kaen University)

Abstract

A statistical influence diagram, called Bayesian Belief Network (BBN), is investigated in modeling the medical breast cancer diagnosis. The proposed BBN is constructed under supervision by medical experts. Four types of datasets, namely, historic biodata, physical findings, indirect and direct mammographic findings are taken into consideration for modeling the BBN. Biodata are comprised of age, number of relatives having breast cancer, age at first live birth and age at menarche. Physical findings consist of pain, axilla, inflame and nipple discharge. Indirect mammo-graphic data are breast composition. Direct mammographic findings are information obtained by mammogram image processing using the proposed cellular automata algorithms. A dataset is collected in real case of the breast cancer patients who come to get serviced at Srinakarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. A dataset of 500 cases is used throughout for model’s performance evaluation. In this regard, an 80 % of data is used for training the model, while the rest of 20 % is utilized for testing. The trained BBN model is tested on 100 patients consisting of 50, 25 and 25 for normal, benign and malignant patients, respectively. The proposed BBN provides the promising results reporting the 96.5 % of accuracy in the diagnosis. In addition, 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation approach are implemented, the proposed BBN reports the promising results. It provides 96.2 and 97.4 percentages of accuracy, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Wongthanavasu, 2011. "A Bayesian Belief Network Model for Breast Cancer Diagnosis," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Bo Hu & Karl Morasch & Stefan Pickl & Markus Siegle (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2010, pages 3-8, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-642-20009-0_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20009-0_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-642-20009-0_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.