IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/nrmchp/978-3-031-52501-8_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Influencing Decision Process

In: Policy Sciences and the Human Dignity Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Susan G. Clark

    (Yale University)

  • Evan J. Andrews

    (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

  • Ana E. Lambert

    (Education and Development (SEED) University of Manchester)

Abstract

Citizens and leaders must successfully influence and participate in processes of decision-making if we expect to advance human dignity and healthy ecologically functioning environments. The decision process—questions, standards, and pitfalls to avoid—can help you identify, create, and secure opportunities to advance human dignity in healthy environments. In other words, building skills in the decision process is key to becoming a responsible citizen or leader. Different goals or value demands (claim making) are expected in problem-solving groups in a democratic society. In these circumstances, there is no shortage of opportunities for you to help decision-make a sound process. As we lay out in this book, the decision process provides a stable frame of reference to organize and understand the interconnected activities of decision-making and draw attention to opportunities to make them more functional. The decision process can help you create or assess different decision-making processes, no matter how complex or seemingly chaotic. The worksheets below can help you attend to your role and work to improve your decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan G. Clark & Evan J. Andrews & Ana E. Lambert, 2024. "Influencing Decision Process," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Policy Sciences and the Human Dignity Gap, chapter 0, pages 149-166, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-031-52501-8_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52501-8_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-031-52501-8_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.