IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/nrmchp/978-3-030-77760-9_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Evolution of Political Hyperbole and Polarization: Echo Chambers and Voter-Elite Feedback Loops

In: Modern Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Leo Simon

    (Monash University and UC Berkeley)

  • Jinhua Zhao

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Many contemporary societies have witnessed increasingly polarized elites engaging in hyperbole in political discourse in order to influence public opinion and policy outcomes. In this paper, we build on the political economic themes explored by Gordon Rausser and extend our earlier collaborative work to study how polarization and hyperbole evolve over time as voter preferences and voices influence the political preferences of elites, while in turn being influenced by elite messages. The dynamic feedback loop between elites and voters generates insights into the critical roles of a number of facets of the polarization phenomenon: echo chambers, the relative influence of extreme versus moderate members within elites’ constituencies, voter sophistication in distinguishing hyperbole from valid information, and the permissive stances taken by social media in relation to fake news. We show that among all these factors, echo chambers play critically important roles in influencing the dynamic evolution of polarization and hyperbole.

Suggested Citation

  • Leo Simon & Jinhua Zhao, 2022. "The Evolution of Political Hyperbole and Polarization: Echo Chambers and Voter-Elite Feedback Loops," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Harry de Gorter & Jill McCluskey & Johan Swinnen & David Zilberman (ed.), Modern Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, pages 249-278, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-030-77760-9_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77760-9_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    C31D71;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-3-030-77760-9_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.