IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/nrmchp/978-0-387-36953-2_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Consumer Attitudes and Market Resistance to Biotech Products

In: Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Wallace E. Huffman

    (Iowa State University)

  • Matt Rousu

    (Susquehanna University)

Abstract

Society has had about 11,000 years of experience with domestication of plants and crop improvement, and 10,000 years with domestication of animals and livestock improvement. Breeding practices in plants have progressed in stages from weak forms of selection, to strong forms of selection, and then to hybridization, mutagenesis, and biotechnology with selection. Only the use of modern biotechnology has created consumer concerns. Current genetically modified (GM) products have been developed primarily from so-called input traits, and consumers tend to see little direct benefit and some risks. U.S. consumers are, however, more receptive than European consumers to GM products. Consumers have expressed a strong preference for GM-content labeling when it is costless, but their preferences drop off dramatically when it is costly. Mandatory labeling is not required in the United States and voluntary labeling would require that non-GM products be labeled; they are the superior product currently. However, this would not meet EU labeling and traceability requirements. The empirical evidence is that U.S. consumers discount GM products a little and EU consumers by a larger amount. U.S. consumer demand for GM products has been shown to respond to biotech industry, environmental, and third-party information differently, depending on the amount of prior information that they have. Those who are uninformed are most affected by anti-biotech and pro-tech information.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallace E. Huffman & Matt Rousu, 2006. "Consumer Attitudes and Market Resistance to Biotech Products," Natural Resource Management and Policy, in: Richard E. Just & Julian M. Alston & David Zilberman (ed.), Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy, chapter 0, pages 201-225, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-0-387-36953-2_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmchp:978-0-387-36953-2_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.