IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-981-97-4045-1_18.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Study on the Prediction Model of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Based on Machine Learning Algorithm

In: Liss 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangge Liu

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Jing Li

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Ruiqi Jia

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Abstract

With the continuous development of the medical field and the rapid advancement of information technology, the application of medical data has become a crucial component of medical practice. The introduction of machine learning methods can analyse large amounts of medical data in a more detailed and rapid manner. By comprehensively evaluating patient demographic information, diagnosis, treatment, and other data in the electronic medical record, we can understand the patient’s health status and potential dangers, and provide a powerful auxiliary support for the doctor’s diagnosis and treatment. Traumatic haemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening clinical condition, and early and accurate prediction and intervention is essential for patient survival and recovery. In this study, for the injury condition of traumatic haemorrhagic shock, based on the emergency database of the General Hospital of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the research experiments were designed under the guidance of professional clinicians, from which the data of relevant patients’ medical indicators were extracted and data preprocessing was carried out. In the model construction stage, the study used five algorithms to construct a traumatic haemorrhagic shock prediction model using simple machine learning models including Logistic Regression, CART, and ensemble learning including Random Forest, XGBoost, and neural network structured multilayer perceptual machine MLP respectively, and the key indicators screened by doctors were used as the inclusion features. In the model evaluation stage, the study used a ten-fold cross-validation method to assess the prediction effect of different machine learning models by indicators such as ROC curve and AUC. The results showed that the XGBoost algorithm had the largest average AUC and the overall prediction effect was better than the other models, and the model had good prediction effect with potential clinical application. Finally, this study used the SHAP method to explain the value of different features to the prediction model from global and individual perspectives, making the model more credible.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangge Liu & Jing Li & Ruiqi Jia, 2024. "A Study on the Prediction Model of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Based on Machine Learning Algorithm," Lecture Notes in Operations Research, in: Daqing Gong & Yixuan Ma & Xiaowen Fu & Juliang Zhang & Xiaopu Shang (ed.), Liss 2023, pages 232-243, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-97-4045-1_18
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-4045-1_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-981-97-4045-1_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.