IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-3-031-76766-1_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Synergistic Integration Between Large Language Models and the Best-Worst Method

Author

Listed:
  • Hunter Briegel

    (Unaffiliated)

  • Tharita Tipdecho

    (The University of Queensland)

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed for a variety of tasks, including recommendation systems. They are uniquely suited to making inferences in zero-shot circumstances given a purported capacity to reason across domains. However, there are several drawbacks to their use that limit real-world applicability. Namely, LLMs make opaque judgements that are not easily understood by users or subject to human control. Additionally, when many alternatives are evaluated, a robust external procedure is needed to control the model’s predictions. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) is an MCDA technique that can be used to extract preference weights and evaluate alternatives in a pairwise manner. This work proposes a hybrid model using BWM and LLMs that provides a human-interpretable framework for AI-ML recommendation. The system can function independently or as a refinement layer on top of existing retrieval systems. Due to the use of natural language as a mediator, it can process a broad spectrum of user and alternative information. An evaluation is conducted using the MovieLens dataset, showing a positive monotonic relationship between our predicted scores and user-submitted reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunter Briegel & Tharita Tipdecho, 2025. "A Synergistic Integration Between Large Language Models and the Best-Worst Method," Lecture Notes in Operations Research,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-76766-1_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-76766-1_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-76766-1_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.