IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-3-031-68974-1_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The DeFi Ecosystem Game: Proof-Via-Simulations

In: Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Eliad Hoch

Abstract

While current research in the design of DeFi protocols tends to focus on tokenomics, token distribution schedules, and other value propositions, it lacks quantitative proofs that takes into account real actors interacting with such systems. In other words, in realistic DeFi ecosystems, there are typically multiple investors with various investment objectives: short-term profit takers, liquidity providers, conservative risk mitigators, and sophisticated actors that maximise turnover at the expense of profits. This, consequently, could significantly influence the value proposition of a project’s native token, leading to a decreased demand for the proposed DeFi product. In an attempt to calibrate a solution, this article will demonstrate a ‘proof-via-simulation’: a game engine embedded with investor type models, competing in a simulated DeFi ecosystem that quantifies their profits and tokenomics statistics over time. Hence, a 40-months simulation of a hypothetical pseudo-realistic DeFi ecosystem is presented and analysed, in which thousands of investors span from 6 investor ‘types’; playing to maximise their investment goals, with the simulation outcomes statistically explored. The ‘proof-via-simulation’, With its code open-sourced, would assist future DeFi foundations to quantitatively assess the validity of their DeFi design principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliad Hoch, 2024. "The DeFi Ecosystem Game: Proof-Via-Simulations," Lecture Notes in Operations Research, in: Stefanos Leonardos & Elise Alfieri & William J. Knottenbelt & Panos Pardalos (ed.), Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy, chapter 0, pages 285-314, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-68974-1_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-68974-1_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-68974-1_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.