IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnopch/978-3-031-24816-0_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method

In: Advances in Best-Worst Method

Author

Listed:
  • Priya Ambilkar

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering)

  • Priyanka Verma

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering)

  • Debabrata Das

    (National Institute of Industrial Engineering)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a well-known technology applied in different industrial applications which have gained more attention over the last three decades. The crucial aspect of AM is designing and managing the supply chain for AM parts. The most critical strategic decision in the initial process of supply chain management is selecting and evaluating suppliers. Selecting an appropriate supplier can lead to reducing costs in supply chain management. Therefore, there is a need to choose a reliable supplier to enhance the performance of their supply network. For the first-time, supplier selection criteria evaluation for the AM domain is examined in this study. This study proposes multi-criteria decision-making based on the best-worst methods to prioritize AM firm’s raw material supplier selection criteria. The best-worst method is generally applied to get the criteria weight. The reliability of the comparisons is checked using a consistency ratio. Then the most important and least important criteria are obtained and considered while selecting a supplier in AM based on the result. Finally, the study concluded the importance of supplier selection for AM. This study further provides a promising avenue for future research opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Priya Ambilkar & Priyanka Verma & Debabrata Das, 2023. "Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method," Lecture Notes in Operations Research, in: Jafar Rezaei & Matteo Brunelli & Majid Mohammadi (ed.), Advances in Best-Worst Method, pages 161-175, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-24816-0_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24816-0_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnopch:978-3-031-24816-0_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.