IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-319-74817-7_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessing the Performance of Automated Model Extraction Rules

In: Advances in Information Systems Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Echeverría

    (Universidad San Jorge)

  • Francisca Pérez

    (Universidad San Jorge)

  • Óscar Pastor

    (Universitat Politècnica de València)

  • Carlos Cetina

    (Universidad San Jorge)

Abstract

Automated Model Extraction Rules take as input requirements (in natural language) to generate domain models. Despite the existing work on these rules, there is a lack of evaluations in industrial settings. To address this gap, we conduct an evaluation in an industrial context, reporting the extraction rules that are triggered to create a model from requirements and their frequency. We also assess the performance in terms of recall, precision and F-measure of the generated model compared to the models created by domain experts of our industrial partner. Results enable us to identify new research directions to push forward automated model extraction rules: the inclusion of new knowledge sources as input for the extraction rules, and the development of specific experiments to evaluate the understanding of the generated models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Echeverría & Francisca Pérez & Óscar Pastor & Carlos Cetina, 2018. "Assessing the Performance of Automated Model Extraction Rules," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Nearchos Paspallis & Marios Raspopoulos & Chris Barry & Michael Lang & Henry Linger & Christoph Schn (ed.), Advances in Information Systems Development, pages 33-49, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-319-74817-7_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74817-7_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-319-74817-7_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.