IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-031-66801-2_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Value-Based Vs Pragmatic Approach to the Sustainable Development of Energy Sector Companies in the Context of Industry 5.0

In: The Future of Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Vetrova

    (Saint-Petersburg University)

  • Tatyana Solovey

    (Saint-Petersburg University)

  • Igor Arenkov

    (Saint-Petersburg University)

  • Dinara Ivanova

    (Saint-Petersburg University)

Abstract

The sustainable development has become acutely relevant in the last decade, and countries are allocating resources to decarbonization of energy and carbon-intensive production and technological processes. Since the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015, the fourth energy transition has become a key challenge to achieving the goal of keeping global warming to 1.5 °C. This is primarily due to the dominant role of energy sector in the emission of climate-active gases, which accounts for more than 75% of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, what causes the interest in studying the involvement of energy companies in ESG-agenda (environmental, social and governance). Therefore, in the context of the formation of Industry 5.0, along with achieving economic goals, digital transformation is aimed at solving social and environmental problems of sustainable development. Companies around the world set ambitious goals, which are published annually in non-financial reports; however, setting goals does not mean achieving them, but only improving their image in the eyes of counterparties, clients, and the state. The relevance of this article is due to the ongoing discussion of experts are the principles of sustainable development integrated into the business model of companies (strategic approach) or is ESG-agenda still about greenwashing (pragmatic approach). In this regard, the research assumption is that companies, despite the ongoing development of Industry 5.0, take a more pragmatic approach to sustainable development. Presumably, with negative changes in external business environment, companies can abandon or change their sustainable development goals to less ambitious ones without explaining their position to stakeholders. The selection of the energy companies is due to the fact that they have a significant environmental and social impact, are one of the leaders in integration principles of Industry 5.0 and they also publish non-financial reporting according to international standards that allow comparing the data. To confirm the assumption, the largest companies in the energy sector and their public non-financial reports in the area of social and environmental goals were analyzed in the period from 2017 to 2022. Non-financial reports of energy companies were examined over time according to such criteria as goal-setting in the field of social and environmental aspects of sustainable development, their changes over the analyzed period, the availability of quantitative data confirming the implementation of the goals, the nature of changes in the goal-setting area (more ambitious goals or, on the contrary, refusal or relaxation of previously set goals). The results of the study confirm the assumption and the need for government regulation and the formation of an institutional environment for the development of a value-based approach to sustainable development by business structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Vetrova & Tatyana Solovey & Igor Arenkov & Dinara Ivanova, 2024. "Value-Based Vs Pragmatic Approach to the Sustainable Development of Energy Sector Companies in the Context of Industry 5.0," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Andrea Appolloni & Vikas Kumar & Evgeny Kuzmin & Victoria Akberdina (ed.), The Future of Industry, pages 107-120, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-66801-2_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-66801-2_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-66801-2_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.