IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-031-58396-4_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Can We Replicate Impaired Vision with Simulation Glasses in Computer-Based Task? An Eye Tracking Validation Study

In: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Yasmine Maurice

    (HEC Montréal)

  • Félix Giroux

    (HEC Montréal)

  • Camille Lasbareilles

    (University of Oxford)

  • Jared Boasen

    (HEC Montréal)

  • Sylvain Sénécal

    (HEC Montréal
    HEC Montréal)

  • Pierre-Majorique Léger

    (HEC Montréal
    HEC Montréal)

Abstract

With growing pressure to develop accessible apps and websites, designers or User Experience researchers also face the challenge of recruiting people with disabilities to conduct inclusive usability evaluations. While many researchers rely on disability simulations to identify usability issues, others argue that disability simulations cannot fully replicate the behavior and the lived experience of people with disabilities. This paper presents a study that investigates whether we can replicate the visual search behavior of low vision people on a computer interface with normally sighted participants experiencing a visual disability simulation. A total of 46 participants, including 9 low vision people, and 37 normally sighted participants with and without visual disability simulation glasses, performed computer-based vision tests and visual search tasks. Using eye tracking, we show that the disability simulation tends to replicate the visual search behavior of low vision participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasmine Maurice & Félix Giroux & Camille Lasbareilles & Jared Boasen & Sylvain Sénécal & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Can We Replicate Impaired Vision with Simulation Glasses in Computer-Based Task? An Eye Tracking Validation Study," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph & Gernot (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 231-242, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-58396-4_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-58396-4_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-58396-4_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.