IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-031-58396-4_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Even-Related Potentials (ERPs) Reveal that Trust and Distrust Differ Between Brands and Political Institutions

In: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Walla

    (Sigmund Freud University
    Sigmund Freud University
    University of Newcastle)

  • Stefan Kalt

    (Sigmund Freud University)

  • Dimitrios Külzer

    (Sigmund Freud University)

Abstract

Trust and distrust are important topics in the NeuroIS field. They have been described as separate constructs. This study provides evidence that brain activity differences between trust and distrust depend on stimulus category. Brand names and names of political institutions were visually presented to participants, who had to evaluate their individual trust or distrust towards those stimuli. First, it was found that stimulus category alone altered brain activities (ERPs) in frontal regions between approximately 200 and 500 ms, but also that trust and distrust differences were different between both categories. Different brain activities elicited by trusted versus distrusted political institutions occurred dominantly in the left frontal region roughly from 200 to 500 ms peaking at about 330 ms after stimulus onset. On the other hand, different brain activities elicited by trusted versus distrusted brands occurred dominantly in the right frontal region roughly from 700 to 900 ms peaking at about 780 ms after stimulus onset. These opposite hemispheric lateralizations confirm the complexity of trust and distrust. Future studies using ERPs as measures could use other stimuli (for instance related to artificial intelligence or neuroadaptive systems) relevant to the NeuroIS community and thus further our understanding of trust and distrust.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Walla & Stefan Kalt & Dimitrios Külzer, 2024. "Even-Related Potentials (ERPs) Reveal that Trust and Distrust Differ Between Brands and Political Institutions," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph & Gernot (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 1-7, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-58396-4_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-58396-4_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-031-58396-4_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.