IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-030-01087-4_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

To like or Not to Like in the World of Instagram: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Instagram Users’ Evaluation Process for Liking an Image

In: Information Systems and Neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-feng Huang

    (National Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Feng-yang Kuo

    (National Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Chia-wen Chen

    (National Sun Yat-Sen University)

Abstract

For image-based social media (e.g., Instagram or Snapchat), understanding people’s decision behind their liking of photos is critical to researchers and practitioners. The liking decision toward an image, however seemingly simple and effortless for browsers, involves an interplay among evaluation dimension (hedonic vs. utilitarian), social influence (pre-existing number of likes), user characteristics, and underlying cognitive activities (effort and attention). The preliminary results from our eye-tracking studies show that the utilitarian evaluation of an image is negatively associated with its liking probability, effort (pupil dilation), and attention (fixation time). Social influence is shown to affect long-term social media users by increasing their hedonic rating and liking intention. The results suggest that using eye movements to predict the liking intention in social media requires the understanding of products’ prominent evaluation dimension and users’ characteristics. Discussions and future work are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-feng Huang & Feng-yang Kuo & Chia-wen Chen, 2019. "To like or Not to Like in the World of Instagram: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of Instagram Users’ Evaluation Process for Liking an Image," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 203-210, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-01087-4_25
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunhwan Kim & Sunmi Lee, 2022. "#ShoutYourAbortion on Instagram: Exploring the Visual Representation of Hashtag Movement and the Public’s Responses," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-030-01087-4_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.