IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnechp/978-3-540-68660-6_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Judgement in Small Decision-Making Problems

In: Developments on Experimental Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Takemi Fujikawa

    (University of Western Sydney)

  • Sobei H. Oda

    (Kyoto Sangyo University)

Abstract

This paper experimentally investigates “small decision-making” (SDM) problems on the ground that many common activities include those problems. SDM problems are defined by three main properties [2]. First, they include repeated tasks; the decision makers (DMs) face the same choice problem many times in similar situations. Second, each single choice is not very essential; the alternatives tend to have similar expected value (EV) that may be fairly small. Finally, the DMs do not have objective prior information as to payoff distribution. In choosing among the possible alternatives, the DMs will have to rely on the immediate and unbiased feedback obtained in similar situations in the past.

Suggested Citation

  • Takemi Fujikawa & Sobei H. Oda, 2007. "Judgement in Small Decision-Making Problems," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Sobei Hidenori Oda (ed.), Developments on Experimental Economics, pages 149-154, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnechp:978-3-540-68660-6_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68660-6_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takemi Fujikawa, 2009. "On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(5), pages 429-435, August.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:429-435 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnechp:978-3-540-68660-6_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.