Author
Abstract
Having a strong reputation is a desirable resource for banks which must face today’s competitive business environment. This chapter aims to (1) investigate the contribution of service quality and relationship investment to building a good reputation and (2) show that the efforts made by banks in maintaining customer relationships ultimately translate into positive outcomes, such as relationship loyalty. Data collected from banking services consumers from two countries were analysed using partial least squares (PLS). Based on 510 responses from Romanian consumers and 525 responses from UK consumers, the proposed framework is tested separately and causal relationships are then compared to examine whether path estimates are invariant across the two countries. Finally, the data is pooled to increase the generalizability of results. Perceptions of both service quality and relationship investment have a significant contribution to building sympathy towards banks and in developing favourable perceptions about their competence. Furthermore, perceived relationship investment acts as a mediator in the relationship between overall service quality and corporate reputation. Finally, this study reinforces the importance of perceived relationship investment and corporate reputation in developing long-lasting relationships by demonstrating the willingness of customers to reciprocate. The findings extend previous knowledge in the field by emphasising the importance of perceived relationship investment in building customers’ sympathy towards service companies as well as favourable perceptions regarding their competence. In addition, the framework herein proposed acknowledges the mediating role of perceived relationship investment between service quality perceptions and corporate reputation. Furthermore, the study builds on signalling and social exchange theories to show that banks’ endeavour to increase their customers’ quality perceptions enhance the benefits of banking institutions. Altogether, results reported in this study are of high relevance from both a theoretical and managerial perspective. Future studies may test the proposed framework in other cultures and explore the mediating role of perceived relationship investment between other factors and corporate reputation. Despite the interest in the two concepts of corporate reputation and perceived relationship investment in either the relationship marketing literature or the corporate reputation literature, the relationship between the two constructs has been only theoretically suggested. Against this background, this chapter is the first to investigate empirically the impact of perceived relationship investment on corporate reputation. It is also the first to assess the potential role of perceived relationship investment in mediating the effect of service quality on corporate reputation.
Suggested Citation
Lăcrămioara Radomir & Alan Wilson, 2018.
"Corporate Reputation: The Importance of Service Quality and Relationship Investment,"
International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, chapter 0, pages 77-123,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-71691-6_4
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71691-6_4
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Svenja Damberg & Manfred Schwaiger & Christian M. Ringle, 2022.
"What’s important for relationship management? The mediating roles of relational trust and satisfaction for loyalty of cooperative banks’ customers,"
Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 3-18, March.
- Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019.
"How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM,"
Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-71691-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.