IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-65052-4_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Selection of Experts for (Probabilistic) Expert Knowledge Elicitation

In: Elicitation

Author

Listed:
  • Fergus Bolger

    (Strategy & Organisation)

Abstract

Several different EKE protocols are reviewed in this volume, each with their pros and cons, but any is only as good as the quality of the experts and their judgments. In this chapter a structured approach to the selection of experts for EKE is presented that is grounded in psychological research. In Part I various definitions of expertise are considered, and indicators and measures that can be used for the selection of experts are identified. Next, some ways of making judgements of uncertain quantities are discussed, as are factors influencing judgment quality. In Part II expert selection is considered within an overall policy-making process. Following the analysis of Part I, two new instruments are presented that can help guide the selection process: expert profiles provide structure to the initial search, while a questionnaire permits matching of experts to the profiles, and assessment of training needs. Issues of expert retention and documentation are also discussed. It is concluded that although the analysis offered in this chapter constitutes a starting point there are many questions still to be answered to maximize EKE’s contribution. A promising direction is research that focusses on the interaction between experts and the tasks they perform.

Suggested Citation

  • Fergus Bolger, 2018. "The Selection of Experts for (Probabilistic) Expert Knowledge Elicitation," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Luis C. Dias & Alec Morton & John Quigley (ed.), Elicitation, chapter 0, pages 393-443, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-65052-4_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belton, Ian & Wright, George & Sissons, Aileen & Bolger, Fergus & Crawford, Megan M. & Hamlin, Iain & Taylor Browne Lūka, Courtney & Vasilichi, Alexandrina, 2021. "Delphi with feedback of rationales: How large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Dao, Uyen & Sajid, Zaman & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Yahui & Tran, Trung, 2023. "Modeling and analysis of internal corrosion induced failure of oil and gas pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Xingyuan Chen & Yong Deng, 2022. "An Evidential Software Risk Evaluation Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Bolger, Fergus & Rowe, Gene & Belton, Ian & Crawford, Megan M & Hamlin, Iain & Sissons, Aileen & Taylor Browne Lūka, Courtney & Vasilichi, Alexandrina & Wright, George, 2020. "The Simulated Group Response Paradigm: A new approach to the study of opinion change in Delphi and other structured-group techniques," OSF Preprints 4ufzg, Center for Open Science.
    5. Marta O. Soares & Mark J. Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2020. "Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 448-459, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-65052-4_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.