IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-319-00669-7_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Paradox of the Mean Variance Setting for the Long Term Investor

In: Models and Methods in Economics and Management Science

Author

Listed:
  • Abraham Lioui

    (EDHEC Business School)

Abstract

We show that the mean-variance preferences have counterfactual implications for a risk averse long term decision maker. In the simple case of dynamic portfolio choice, we show that the optimal certainty equivalent is decreasing with the investor’s horizon towards its lower bound, the riskless rate. For some horizons (less than 25 years in our simulations), the economic value of diversification is 0 and therefore the optimal portfolio strategy is a buy and hold one in the riskless asset. Therefore, under-diversification is optimal. These results question the usefulness of the mean variance setting for long term dynamic decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Abraham Lioui, 2014. "A Paradox of the Mean Variance Setting for the Long Term Investor," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Fouad El Ouardighi & Konstantin Kogan (ed.), Models and Methods in Economics and Management Science, edition 127, pages 75-93, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-00669-7_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00669-7_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-00669-7_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.