IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-030-46474-5_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Reminiscences of a Classical Model Expert Elicitation Facilitator

In: Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Willy Aspinall

    (University of Bristol and Aspinall & Associates)

Abstract

In this chapter, I trace my introduction to the Classical Model and to the thoughts and philosophy of Roger Cooke, and then go on to recount some experiences of acting as a facilitator in many real world and sometimes crucial expert elicitations. The essence of my own history is that it took me a very long time to start to understand, and appreciate, the elegance of Roger’s Classical Model (Cooke 1991), its mathematical probity and how it is best deployed in application. I am sure I still haven’t fully mastered the probability calculus entirely, and don’t doubt others might quarrel with my preferred way of conducting elicitations that rely on the Classical Model, using a plenary workshop approach. This said, I can’t find, devise or even imagine, a better alternative to the Classical Model. And, on top of this extraordinary intellectual achievement, Roger Cooke has been a beneficent collaborator nonpareil, always willing to help me, and anyone else, avoid self-inflicted elicitation and probabilistic infelicities.

Suggested Citation

  • Willy Aspinall, 2021. "Reminiscences of a Classical Model Expert Elicitation Facilitator," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Anca M. Hanea & Gabriela F. Nane & Tim Bedford & Simon French (ed.), Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis, chapter 0, pages 389-399, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-46474-5_17
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46474-5_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-46474-5_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.