IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-3-030-43384-0_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Effects of Locus of Control on Bank’s Policy—A Case Study of a Chinese State-Owned Bank

In: Data Science and Productivity Analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Xu

    (Manchester University)

  • Guo-liang Yang

    (Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Jian-bo Yang

    (Manchester University)

  • Yu-wang Chen

    (Manchester University)

  • Hua-ying Zhu

    (Manchester University)

Abstract

This paper investigates how Locus of Control (LOC) will impact the bank’s policies through a case study of a Chinese state-owned bank. At the end of 2008, the investigated bank implemented a personal business-preferred policy. We established two Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models to test the impacts of LOC on the implementation of the policy. The results show that internal-controlled branches tend to be more sensitive to the bank’s policy. When it is a positive policy, the internal-controlled branches tend to improve more than the external-controlled branches, while the regression of internal branches is also more significant when it is a negative policy. Location and managers’ personalities are identified as the two direct reasons that cause LOC effects. Several suggestions are also provided in this paper to alleviate the negative effects of LOC.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Xu & Guo-liang Yang & Jian-bo Yang & Yu-wang Chen & Hua-ying Zhu, 2020. "Effects of Locus of Control on Bank’s Policy—A Case Study of a Chinese State-Owned Bank," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Vincent Charles & Juan Aparicio & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Science and Productivity Analytics, chapter 0, pages 311-335, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-43384-0_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43384-0_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-43384-0_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.