IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isbchp/978-981-13-6443-3_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Burden of Private Healthcare Expenditure: A Study of Three Districts

In: Growth, Disparities and Inclusive Development in India

Author

Listed:
  • C. S. Verma

    (Giri Institute of Development Studies)

  • Shivani Singh

    (Giri Institute of Development Studies)

Abstract

Provision of affordable health care to all, irrespective of their paying capacity, is the fundamental duty of a welfare state like India. However, the state has failed to fulfill its promise to provide health security to all. Post liberalization, there is a shift from welfare-oriented government health policies to market-oriented policies. This has further resulted in unregulated and unaccountable expansion of private health care sector. With the involvement of corporate players, the scenario has clearly shifted from ‘mere privatization’ to commercialization and corporatization of the healthcare sector. The new National Health Policy (2017) also promotes such health policies that will further promote the commercialization of services even within public facilities. Although the country has emerged as one of the leading destinations for high-end private healthcare facilities, the private healthcare sector is heterogeneous, widely mal-distributed, and is hardly able to provide minimum quality of care. In a state like Uttar Pradesh, the increasing out-of-pocket expenditure on health is among one of the biggest causes of impoverishment. This article analyzes the pattern of healthcare expenditure in public and private healthcare sectors in the state and how private healthcare market is flourishing at the cost of public healthcare sector. For this, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on ambulatory care and inpatient care in public and private sectors has been assessed across a sample of 3338 household spread across 47 villages and 13 wards in three districts of Uttar Pradesh. Recall period for inpatient care was 365 days and for outpatient care was 30 days. The findings from the study suggest that although majority of people prefer private healthcare, the choice of private provider depends on the economic status of the people. People from lower economic group seek care from RMPs, unregistered, and informal providers while people from higher income groups seek care from high-end private facilities. The OOPE is high in both public as well as private, more so in private sector. Lack of trained personnel, drugs, and equipment in public healthcare sector is the cause of high OOPE there. The high costs of good quality private healthcare services further deprive the people of lower economic strata from proper healthcare services because of their lack of affordability. Low coverage under health insurance schemes like Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) and dominance of private hospitals in providing treatment under the schemes has also resulted in failure of health insurance in reducing OOPE. Lack of proper regulatory and monitoring authority and legal provisions further leads to exorbitant prices and corrupt practices in private sector. In order to provide universal health coverage and ensure healthcare for all, it is the need of the hour to promote private healthcare sector, but at the same time, it needs to be properly regulated and monitored. The government should strengthen public health system by increasing the public expenditure on preventive and primary healthcare in order to reduce the OOPE on health.

Suggested Citation

  • C. S. Verma & Shivani Singh, 2019. "Burden of Private Healthcare Expenditure: A Study of Three Districts," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Rajendra P. Mamgain (ed.), Growth, Disparities and Inclusive Development in India, pages 393-411, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-13-6443-3_17
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6443-3_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-981-13-6443-3_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.