IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-74881-8_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Following the Footprints of SME Competitiveness in a High-Technology Sector

In: Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Luís Farinha

    (Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco & NECE at University of Beira Interior, PT)

  • Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen

    (State University of New York – Buffalo)

Abstract

This chapter examines the competitiveness footprints of SMEs within a high-tech cluster. A mixed methodology combining quantitative and qualitative data is used. More specifically, a case study is offered to show trends in innovative and entrepreneurial collaboration associated with an internationally competitive high-tech cluster. The findings shed light on the importance of collective efficiency strategies, with a focus on RD&I, implemented by SMEs that operate in an international and competitive market. This chapter highlights the lessons learned in two specific aspects: the role of innovation in the competitiveness of SMEs and the role of innovation and entrepreneurship networks in enhancing the functions of a high-technology industrial cluster, the Portuguese Engineering and Tooling Cluster.

Suggested Citation

  • Luís Farinha & Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen, 2019. "Following the Footprints of SME Competitiveness in a High-Technology Sector," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & João J. Ferreira & Jose M. Merigó Lindahl (ed.), Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations, chapter 0, pages 77-95, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-74881-8_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74881-8_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beili Li & Xu Fan & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Jacob Cherian & László Vasa, 2021. "CSR and Workplace Autonomy as Enablers of Workplace Innovation in SMEs through Employees: Extending the Boundary Conditions of Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-74881-8_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.