IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-39056-7_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Using Enhanced Patent Data for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis

In: Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher L. Benson

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Christopher L. Magee

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Patents represent one of the most complete sources of information related to technological change, and they also contain much detailed information not available anywhere else. Thus, patents are the ‘big data’ source most closely related to future-oriented technology analysis (FTA). Not surprisingly, therefore, there is very significant practical and academic use of the patent database for understanding past technical change and attempting to forecast future change. This paper summarizes several new methods and demonstrates their combined effectiveness in establishing a cutting-edge capability for patent study not previously available. This capability can be stated as a link between the information in patents and the dynamics of technological change. The demonstrated capability relies upon the use of a database containing the rates of improvement for various technologies. We also specify the term we use for the analysed units of technology: a technological domain is a set of artefacts that meets a specific generic function while utilizing a specific set of engineering and scientific knowledge. This definition is unambiguous enough so technological domains can be linked with progress rates and are sufficiently flexible to accommodate the large scale and complexity of the patent database. The existence of an improvement rate database and its quality is a critical foundation for this paper. Establishing the overall capability also involves relating the rate of improvement of a technological domain to the patents in that domain. We show that a recently developed method called the classification overlap method (COM) provides a reliable and largely automated way to break the patent database into understandable technological domains where progress can be measured. In this paper, we show how this method overcomes the third limitation of the patent database. The major conclusion of the paper is that there is now an overall objective method named Patent Technology Rate Indicator (PTRI) for using just patent data to reliably estimate the rate of technological progress in a technological domain. Thus, the first link between the patent database information and the dynamics of technological change is now firmly established; robustness and back-casting tests have shown that the assertion of reliability is meaningful and that the estimate has predictive value. We demonstrate the key methodology of new elements (use of COM and rate estimation from the selected patent sets) for 15 technologies that some have thought have possible future importance. The 15 cases also demonstrate the usefulness of the overall method by estimating technological improvement rates that are significantly different for this group of technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher L. Benson & Christopher L. Magee, 2016. "Using Enhanced Patent Data for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Tugrul U. Daim & Denise Chiavetta & Alan L. Porter & Ozcan Saritas (ed.), Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis, chapter 0, pages 119-131, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-39056-7_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changbae Mun & Sejun Yoon & Hyunseok Park, 2019. "Structural decomposition of technological domain using patent co-classification and classification hierarchy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 633-652, November.
    2. Fang Han & Christopher L. Magee, 2018. "Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 767-796, August.
    3. Christopher L. Benson & Christopher L. Magee, 2018. "Data-Driven Investment Decision-Making: Applying Moore's Law and S-Curves to Business Strategies," Papers 1805.06339, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-39056-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.