IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fimchp/978-3-031-04067-2_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008

In: Blind Spots in the Spotlight

Author

Listed:
  • Raluca Iacob

    (National School of Political Studies and Public Administration)

Abstract

This research provides the perspectives of the general public and the specialized public on the communication of the National Bank of Romania (NBR) after 2008. According to the results of two sociological surveys based on questionnaires (specialized public, N = 186; general public, N = 391), both categories of public believe that the central bank communicated more after 2008, compared to the pre-crisis period, on both nonmonetary and monetary issues. They also agreed that the messages on monetary and nonmonetary issues that are closer to the mission of the central bank were most clearly communicated in the post-crisis period. The perceived level of clarity decreased as the topics proposed for evaluation moved further away from the mandate of the NBR. The analysis shows that the trust of both categories of public in the NBR was eroded in the post-crisis period and that confidence in the NBR could be restored through greater clarity in communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Raluca Iacob, 2022. "Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008," Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, in: Blind Spots in the Spotlight, chapter 0, pages 131-153, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fimchp:978-3-031-04067-2_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04067-2_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fimchp:978-3-031-04067-2_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.