IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eurchp/978-3-319-27573-4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing the Value Relevance of Cash Flow Ratios and DU Pont Ratios under IFRS: A Case Study

In: Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics - Vol. 2

Author

Listed:
  • Gokce Sinem Erbuga

    (Dokuz Eylul University)

Abstract

In this research, the main aim is to point out the importance of financial reporting from the companies’ both internal and external points of view. For this reason it is good to emphasize that the accounting knowledge that will be gained by the companies’ financial reports leads the way in decision making process of the internal and the external environment of the companies. Within this context, the financial ratios have been classified and described. By the reason of the fact that cash flow ratios and Du Pont ratios are the key considerations of the research, these mentioned ratios have been examined in more detail. While taking the next step, the value relevance of the cash flow ratios and Du Pont ratios have been compared. Within this value relevance comparison process, the companies that take place in BIST 100 have been taken into consideration. While comparing the value relevance of the cash flow ratios and Du Pont ratios of the BIST 100 companies, the effects of the CFFO, ROA, and ROE on the companies’ stock prices and stock returns have been examined. Based on the findings that are obtained from the research, ROE and ROA are consistent with the stock price and/or return.

Suggested Citation

  • Gokce Sinem Erbuga, 2016. "Comparing the Value Relevance of Cash Flow Ratios and DU Pont Ratios under IFRS: A Case Study," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis (ed.), Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics - Vol. 2, edition 1, pages 97-111, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-319-27573-4_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27573-4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-319-27573-4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.