IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eurchp/978-3-030-35051-2_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Praxeology in Innovative Healthcare Project Evaluation

In: Eurasian Business Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Tadeusz A. Grzeszczyk

    (Warsaw University of Technology)

  • Marek Zawada

    (Warsaw University of Technology)

Abstract

The main aim of this chapter is to examine the applicability of praxeological theory to the evaluation of innovative projects in the healthcare sector. We propose a set of project evaluation criteria and indicators. The empirical data used in the pilot study was taken from projects carried out by a Contract Research Organization. The analyzed projects regard R&D as well as clinical and observational studies. Interviews were conducted with experienced people in the R&D projects management, projects carried out jointly by scientific units, along with commercial projects in the medicine and pharmaceutical industry. The results of the conducted analyses formulate key criteria and indicators (based on effectiveness, economicality, and efficacy) for evaluating the performance of innovative healthcare projects. The conclusions drawn from the research results allow to claim that it is possible to use praxeological theory in the evaluation of healthcare projects. The chapter presents current problems important from the point of view of management sciences and undertaken research development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadeusz A. Grzeszczyk & Marek Zawada, 2020. "Praxeology in Innovative Healthcare Project Evaluation," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Meltem Ş. Ucal (ed.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, pages 87-102, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-030-35051-2_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35051-2_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-030-35051-2_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.