IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eclchp/978-981-13-0350-0_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Towards an Analytical Framework of Constitutionalism in East Asia: The Case of Taiwan

In: Taiwan and International Human Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Chih Lin

    (Academia Sinica)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the reemergence of discussions on Confucian constitutionalism, communitarian constitutionalism, and Asian values. Despite the differences of these concepts, all reject Western liberal constitutionalism, emphasizing that Asian countries should prioritize social and economic rights over civil and political rights. Nevertheless, this dichotomy in fact does not hold in Taiwan and many other East Asian jurisdictions. This chapter suggests that, on the one hand, constitutionalism in East Asia is inevitably a blend of liberal constitutionalism and Confucian constitutionalism. Namely, in East Asia, the differences between democracies and dictatorships in this regard are often a matter of degree, not of kind. On the other hand, human rights are better protected in Taiwan than in most other Asian countries because the progress in human rights is taking place concomitantly with the decline of Confucianism. From this perspective, it is plausible that Taiwan will become the only democracy among societies that predominantly are comprised of people of Chinese descent precisely because it discards Confucianism and Asian values, which serve as a veneer of legitimacy for autocrats to justify dictatorship.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Chih Lin, 2019. "Towards an Analytical Framework of Constitutionalism in East Asia: The Case of Taiwan," Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, in: Jerome A. Cohen & William P. Alford & Chang-fa Lo (ed.), Taiwan and International Human Rights, chapter 0, pages 97-111, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-13-0350-0_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0350-0_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-13-0350-0_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.