IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eclchp/978-981-13-0350-0_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Isolated but not Oblivious: Taiwan’s Acceptance of the Two Major Human Rights Covenants

In: Taiwan and International Human Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Jie Chen

    (Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica
    U.S.-Asia Law Institute, NYU School of Law)

Abstract

Since the Republic of China on Taiwan (ROC or Taiwan) lost the seat of China in the United Nations (UN) to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1971, the ROC government has been excluded from the UN system, including its human rights treaty regime. Despite this isolation, Taiwan nevertheless ratified the two major UN human rights covenants in 2009—the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This development is a milestone in Taiwan’s engagement with international human rights law. Although Taiwan’s attempt to deposit the instruments of ratification with the UN was rejected, it is committed to following the covenants by granting them the status of domestic legislation and instituting mechanisms to implement them. The efforts of Taiwan as a non-UN member state to adopt the two human rights covenants are a shot in the arm for the international human rights system. This chapter examines how a state shut out of the UN human rights regime became a strong supporter of the regime. With special attention to the relevant advocacy campaigns and political discussions, this chapter seeks to identify the driving forces behind Taiwan’s ratification. More broadly, the case study of Taiwan offers insight into the social, legal and political processes of a bottom-up ratification campaign as well as the obstacles in a contested political context.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Jie Chen, 2019. "Isolated but not Oblivious: Taiwan’s Acceptance of the Two Major Human Rights Covenants," Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, in: Jerome A. Cohen & William P. Alford & Chang-fa Lo (ed.), Taiwan and International Human Rights, chapter 0, pages 207-225, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-13-0350-0_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0350-0_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-13-0350-0_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.