IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eclchp/978-981-10-1995-1_27.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Patent Right in China: Influences from the West and China’s Responses

In: Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order

Author

Listed:
  • Tsai-fang Chen

    (National Chiao Tung University)

Abstract

At the beginning, China was reluctant to establish a patent law system. Patent is a concept of Western origin, and Chinese patent law has been developed under foreign pressure. Reform and development with respect to patent rights and enforcement nevertheless have become an important area to attract foreign investment. Over time, the country has realized that the utilitarian nature of this private right suits its development needs and it now fully embraces the concept. Patent law has become one of the main targets of the government in its attempt to establish a modern legal system. It has also become a symbol of the country’s technological advancement. Patent rules in China are now very similar to those of its Western counterparts. The enforcement mechanism has been reformed with a view to enhancing patent rights. The administrative remedy of patent infringement is a unique feature in China’s patent enforcement system, which has its drawbacks. By contrast, the establishment of Intellectual Property Courts is a clear sign of the development of a more autonomous, independent, and professional judiciary in the area of patent law. The most watched area with regard to the patent system at this moment is the government’s application of antitrust law in the patent licensing practices, especially in the field of standard and essential patents (SEPs). The trend of the cases in this field suggests that China is very active in enforcing its antitrust laws. On the one hand, China is enhancing the protection of patent rights when domestic patent holders are gaining ground in terms of the quality of their patents. On the other hand, China is using its antitrust law to limit the power of foreign SEP holders. From this perspective, the Chinese government is using antitrust laws to achieve what it cannot do by patent law. Under the TRIPS Agreement, there is no room for discriminatory treatment in patent law. Through the aggressive enforcement of antitrust laws, however, the Chinese authorities can limit the patent rights of foreign holders while at the same time empowering domestic patentees. Legal rules in China in the field of patent law are an interesting case study. China accepted patent law from the West and also created many unique responses along the way. Many of these unique responses fulfilled their temporal missions and gradually became less important. Now China is using another Western legal concept, antitrust law, to create the optimal patent law environment for its needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsai-fang Chen, 2016. "Patent Right in China: Influences from the West and China’s Responses," Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, in: Chang-fa Lo & Nigel N.T. Li & Tsai-yu Lin (ed.), Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order, chapter 0, pages 475-489, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-10-1995-1_27
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Patent; China; SEP; Antitrust; Patent law;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-10-1995-1_27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.