IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-319-10311-2_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Implementing International Good Practice Standards: Pragmatism Versus Philosophy

In: Responsible Investment Banking

Author

Listed:
  • L. Reed Huppman

    (Guyana Goldfields Inc.)

Abstract

Mainstreaming environmental and social considerations is something people have been working on for many years, and still are. For economists, the environment was considered an externality—if you cannot quantify it, you cannot incorporate it into your economic model. This is an ongoing problem, though tremendous strides have been made. John Dixon at the World Bank was one of the first to tackle this divide. Two years prior to the creation of the original Equator Principles, the four founding banks—Citibank, Barclays, WestLB and ABN Amro, each experienced a reputational crisis fomented by NGOs that led them to found what later was to become the Equator Principles. The four banks—Citi, Barclays ABN Amro and West LB—eventually got together, and this was the catalyst for the Equator Principles. They discussed that they needed some sort of environmental and social policy framework for project finance lending across the board. Although it was a cautious approach, it was a brave move. It took two more years of lobbying to recruit another six banks to have a critical mass of 10 for the original launch in June 2003. It has taken another 10 years to exceed 75 members.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Reed Huppman, 2015. "Implementing International Good Practice Standards: Pragmatism Versus Philosophy," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Karen Wendt (ed.), Responsible Investment Banking, edition 127, pages 333-338, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-10311-2_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10311-2_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-10311-2_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.