IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-031-53877-3_49.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Reality of the Quality of Education in Postgraduate Programs at Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie from Students’ Point of View

In: Board Diversity and Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jafar Wasfi Abu Saa

    (Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the quality of education in postgraduate programs at Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie from the perspective of students. A total of 109 male and female students participated in the study. The research methodology involved the use of a questionnaire consisting of 20 statements to measure the quality of education in postgraduate programs. The findings revealed an average score of 3.38 with a standard deviation of 0.91, indicating a moderate level of quality. Furthermore, the study found no statistically significant differences (at a significance level of 0.05) in the perception of education quality among postgraduate students at Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie based on variables such as gender, college, and academic level. In conclusion, the study put forth several recommendations. Among the most important ones are granting students in postgraduate programs more autonomy in selecting external examiners for their research theses, and the provision of dedicated spaces within the university library for postgraduate students, along with extended operating hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Jafar Wasfi Abu Saa, 2024. "The Reality of the Quality of Education in Postgraduate Programs at Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie from Students’ Point of View," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Reem Khamis & Amina Buallay (ed.), Board Diversity and Corporate Governance, pages 617-629, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-53877-3_49
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-53877-3_49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-53877-3_49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.