IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-031-53877-3_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Level of Digital Competence and Its Relationship to the Quality of E-Learning Among Faculty Members in Jordanian Universities

In: Board Diversity and Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Hani S. A. Alkaldi

    (Faculty of Educational Science, Isra)

  • Reda S. M. Al-Mawadieh

    (Faculty of Educational Science, Zarqa)

  • Ruaa Binsaddig

    (College of Business Administration, University of Business and Technology)

Abstract

The study aimed to reveal the level of digital proficiency and its relationship to the quality of e-learning among faculty members in Jordanian universities. The results of the study indicate that the arithmetic average of the digital proficiency of the faculty members was 61.5, which is a value very close to the hypothetical average, and this means that the digital proficiency of the faculty members is low. The results also showed that the arithmetic mean of the quality of e-learning among faculty members was 79.36, which is a much higher value than the hypothetical average, and this means that the quality of e-learning among faculty members is high. It was also found that there is a direct and statistically significant relationship with a value of 0.368, and this means that there is a relationship between digital competence and the level of quality of e-learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Hani S. A. Alkaldi & Reda S. M. Al-Mawadieh & Ruaa Binsaddig, 2024. "The Level of Digital Competence and Its Relationship to the Quality of E-Learning Among Faculty Members in Jordanian Universities," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Reem Khamis & Amina Buallay (ed.), Board Diversity and Corporate Governance, pages 31-44, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-53877-3_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-53877-3_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-53877-3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.