IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-030-41142-8_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

What Drives the Level of Non-financial Assurance in PIEs? Empirical Evidence on the European Firms Listed on Forbes 2000

In: Accounting, Accountability and Society

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Venturelli

    (University of Salento)

  • Simone Pizzi

    (University of Salento)

Abstract

Since December 2017, all the European members have transposed the Directive 2014/95/EU into their legal systems. The aim of the directive was to promote the harmonization of non-financial information through the definition of guidelines aimed at regulating its content. In accordance with the principle of gold plating, the transposition of the directive into national legal systems has been characterized by the prediction of different constraints. In particular, the Member States have provided for different rules on the activity of external assurance. This phenomenon represents one of the most difficult for an effective non-financial reporting harmonization in Europe. The provision of a third-party assurance is one of the most important drivers to achieve legitimization by the stakeholder. In particular, previous studies have shown that non-financial information presents a physiological gap in credibility toward stakeholders. This credibility gap stems from the risk of greenwashing; that is, the attitude of management to report false or untruthful information of a non-financial type in order to pursue utilitarian benefits. Also, from the investor’s point of view, the third-party external assurance could be useful to evaluate the firm’s performance before investing. In particular, it shows that assurance of sustainability reporting is comparable, in terms of its effects on stakeholders, to the financial statement certification process. According to previous studies, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the third-party external assurance of the non-financial information produced by the European PIE in 2017. Our findings will provide further information regarding the effective level of harmonization of non-financial reporting in Europe after the implementation of the Directive 2014/95/EU. Also, we evaluate how the legal provision of a third-party external assurance impacted the choice of firms to adopt this kind of legitimization strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Venturelli & Simone Pizzi, 2020. "What Drives the Level of Non-financial Assurance in PIEs? Empirical Evidence on the European Firms Listed on Forbes 2000," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Mara Del Baldo & Jesse Dillard & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli & Massimo Ciambotti (ed.), Accounting, Accountability and Society, pages 245-265, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-41142-8_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41142-8_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Venturelli & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Salvatore Principale, 2020. "The revision of nonfinancial reporting directive: A critical lens on the comparability principle," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3584-3597, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-41142-8_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.