Author
Abstract
Transitions to renewable energy (RE) have been the subject of considerable debate in both academic and policy circles (Geels, Research Policy 31(8/9):1257–1274, 2002). In this study, we examine documents at both state and federal level to ascertain whether key stakeholders, such as mining, business, utilities and the energy sector, are concerned with, and effectively planning for, a renewable energy transition. It is critical to examine their views, since powerful stakeholders can strengthen, or undermine, the commitment of government to a renewable energy transition. The literature shows quite clearly that government policies are critical in transitions, for instance policies can spur private investment and influence actors’ perceptions of the risk-reward equation (Wüstenhagen and Menichetti, Energy Policy 40:1–10, 2012). We highlight the assumptions, narratives and tensions that underlie an energy transition. As a theoretical basis for this research, the lens of ‘social acceptance’, including socio-political, community and market acceptance, is employed (Wüstenhagen, Wolsink, and Bürer, Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691, 2007). The study evaluates social acceptance of renewable energy on a continuum ranging from ‘not accepted’, ‘moving towards acceptance’, and ‘high acceptance’ where responses are progressive and innovative. Although scholars note that owners of fossil fuels are a powerful lobby group and are able to obstruct ambitious climate policy quite effectively because they are well-organised and their business models are based on the use of cheap fossil fuels (Edenhofer and Flachsland, Global Trends 2013. Development and Peace Foundation, Bonn, pp. 53–72; Hall and Taplin, Australian Journal of Social Issues 43(3):359–379, 2008), this study found that there is a certain level of social acceptance for an energy transition. Key stakeholders—mining, utilities, energy and the business sector—support an integrated climate and energy policy to help Australia meets its commitments under the Paris agreement.
Suggested Citation
Breda McCarthy & Lynne Eagle, 2019.
"Attitudes of Incumbent Regimes to a Renewable Energy Transition: A Case Study of Queensland, Australia,"
CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Gabriel Eweje & Ralph J. Bathurst (ed.), Clean, Green and Responsible?, chapter 0, pages 227-252,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-21436-4_13
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_13
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-21436-4_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.