IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-319-60696-5_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Institutional Ambiguity of Regulation of Possessory Relations in Modern Russia

In: Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management

Author

Listed:
  • Agnessa O. Inshakova

    (Volgograd State University)

  • Alexandr I. Goncharov

    (Volgograd State University)

  • Maxim V. Sevostyanov

    (Volgograd State University)

Abstract

The article explores the institutional ambiguity of the legal regulation of possessory relations by the general and special rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The author’s position is based on the analysis of the conception of improvement of civil legislation and subsequent changes introduced in a number of provisions of part 1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in 2014–2016, unfortunately without affecting the content of article 209 of the Civil Code. However, according to the authors, this norm, serving as a concentrated expression of the theoretical views of representatives of the Russian civil law and a key element of the ownership principles, raises a number of uncertainties in the current regulation of the possessory relations, negatively affecting the trend and development of the trade in general. The authors criticize the “everything that is not prohibited is permitted” method of regulating the possessory relations, which is supported by scientists on the basis of regulatory permission of all the owner’s operations in his sole discretion. They note “overrunning” off the institutional framework in part 2 of article 209 of the Civil Code.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnessa O. Inshakova & Alexandr I. Goncharov & Maxim V. Sevostyanov, 2017. "Institutional Ambiguity of Regulation of Possessory Relations in Modern Russia," Contributions to Economics, in: Elena G. Popkova (ed.), Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management, pages 207-212, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-60696-5_25
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60696-5_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-60696-5_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.