IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-030-94586-2_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Two Chief Epistemic Styles of Mathematical Ecology

In: Historical Epistemology of Ecological Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Fragio

    (Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Unidad Cuajimalpa)

Abstract

In this chapter, I deal with the disciplinary speciation of mathematical ecology in the light of the neo-Kantian thesis according to which modern science ensued from the process of mathematization of nature. The issue of a historical epistemology of mathematical ecology finds a suitable place in this context, that is to say, in what I call “the two chief epistemic styles of mathematical ecology”, the “Galilean style” and the “fictional style”. The first one – the “Galilean style” – finds exemplification in astronomy studies and considers nature as an expression of rationality. The Galilean style works on the assumption that the laws of nature can be discovered and expressed in the language of mathematics. Differently, the “fictional style” takes mathematical representations as “fictions” aimed to adjust the empirical basis to a scientific theory. Its distinctive feature lies in assuming an ontological distance between the natural object and its mathematical representation. My main claim is that the historical oscillation between both chief epistemic styles proves the epistemological historicity of mathematical ecology.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Fragio, 2022. "The Two Chief Epistemic Styles of Mathematical Ecology," Contributions to Economics, in: Historical Epistemology of Ecological Economics, pages 113-122, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-030-94586-2_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94586-2_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-030-94586-2_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.