IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advchp/978-981-13-3369-9_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Perceived Preparedness and Attitude of Japanese Households Toward Risk Mitigation Activities Following the Great East Japan Earthquake: Earthquake Insurance Purchase and Seismic Retrofitting

In: Housing Markets and Household Behavior in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Miki Seko

    (Musashino University)

Abstract

The Great East Japan EarthquakeThe Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent tsunami on March 11, 2011, were a wake-up call for Japan’s enormous earthquake risk and the need for appropriate measures to mitigate disasters. We use unique survey data collected after the earthquake to examine how consumers reacted to this catastrophic event. We find that self-reported, perceived preparedness for natural disastersSelf-reported, perceived preparedness for natural disaster has significantly improved even among low-income households after March 11, but that post-quake intentions for more specific risk mitigation activities were systematically associated with household income and wealth levels. High-income households are more likely to plan the purchase of earthquake insurance or to conduct seismic retrofittingSeismic retrofitting following the March 11 earthquake, indicating that the recent events might have widened the gap in disaster preparednessDisaster between rich and poor. Obviously, earthquake insuranceEarthquake insurance is one of the most effective measures for mitigating earthquake losses. Nonetheless, despite increased disaster awareness and preparedness following the March 11, 2011 earthquake, the proportion of Japanese households covered by earthquake insurance is still low. We aim to reveal the reasons deterring people from purchasing earthquake insurance. Moreover, our dataset has enabled us to analyze the post-quake attitudes by households that have not taken out earthquake insurance. Our empirical results suggest that typical homeowners would like to purchase insurance in response to the recent earthquake. However, we have also found these post-quake responses to be heterogeneous. That is, households with substantial home equity are more likely to be dissatisfied with the current earthquake insurance system and are therefore reluctant to purchase new insurance. The current Japanese earthquake insurance system restricts the amount of insurance benefitsInsurance benefits and imposes expensive insurance premiumsInsurance premiums on consumers who require high compensation. These limitations apparently prevent homeowners from purchasing earthquake insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Miki Seko, 2019. "Perceived Preparedness and Attitude of Japanese Households Toward Risk Mitigation Activities Following the Great East Japan Earthquake: Earthquake Insurance Purchase and Seismic Retrofitting," Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, in: Housing Markets and Household Behavior in Japan, chapter 0, pages 231-249, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advchp:978-981-13-3369-9_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3369-9_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalfin & Sukono & Sudradjat Supian & Mustafa Mamat, 2022. "Insurance as an Alternative for Sustainable Economic Recovery after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Fabrizio Terenzio Gizzi & Jonghun Kam & Donatella Porrini, 2020. "Time windows of opportunities to fight earthquake under-insurance: evidence from Google Trends," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advchp:978-981-13-3369-9_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.