IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/adspcp/978-3-642-01554-0_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

From Complexity to Simplicity

In: Complexity and Spatial Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Aura Reggiani

    (University of Bologna)

Abstract

“Near is beautiful” was argued by Miller (2004, p. 248) in his essay on “Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis”. The awareness has also grown that relations among things that are near can generate complex spatio-temporal phenomena. The simplicity of Tobler's law invokes reflections on the complexity of interacting phenomena and the ‘simple’ laws which have been articulated in the scientific literature when attempting to ‘decode’ these phenomena. Certainly, from a spatial economic viewpoint, Tobler's law is consistent with the minimum cost-distance principle. In addition, Miller sheds light on the meaning of ‘near’ and ‘distant’: near is central to the space-economy, it is a more flexible and powerful concept than is often appreciated, and it could be expanded to include both space and time. Thus, not only (near or distant) space, but also the time component is fundamental in the analysis of the interacting economic phenomena. In parallel with Tobler, Hägerstrand (1967) pointed to the relevance of joint space-time diffusion processes, and Wilson (1967) linked spatial interaction with statistical information principles and entropy laws. An associated microeconomic foundation of spatial interaction modelling was subsequently developed by Anas (1983) on the basis of random utility theory (McFadden 1974). Later on, Nijkamp and Reggiani (1992) linked dynamic entropy with (dynamic) spatial interaction models.

Suggested Citation

  • Aura Reggiani, 2009. "From Complexity to Simplicity," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Complexity and Spatial Networks, chapter 0, pages 275-284, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-642-01554-0_19
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01554-0_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Banaszak & Michal Dziecielski & Peter Nijkamp & Waldemar Ratajczak, 2015. "Self-Organisation in Spatial Systems—From Fractal Chaos to Regular Patterns and Vice Versa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Emmanouil Tranos & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Digital infrastructure and physical proximity," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 8, pages 267-290, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Emmanouil Tranos & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "The Death Of Distance Revisited: Cyber-Place, Physical And Relational Proximities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 855-873, December.
    4. Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Did Zipf Anticipate Spatial Connectivity Structures?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(3), pages 468-489, June.
    5. Aura Reggiani & Pietro Bucci & Giovanni Russo, 2011. "Accessibility and Impedance Forms: Empirical Applications to the German Commuting Network," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 34(2), pages 230-252, April.
    6. Aura Reggiani, 2022. "The Architecture of Connectivity: A Key to Network Vulnerability, Complexity and Resilience," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 415-437, September.
    7. Michał Banaszak & Michał Dziecielski & Peter Nijkamp & Waldemar Ratajczak, 2019. "Geography in motion: Hexagonal spatial systems in fuzzy gravitation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 393-402, March.
    8. Reggiani, Aura, 2013. "Network resilience for transport security: Some methodological considerations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 63-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-642-01554-0_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.