IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/aaechp/978-3-030-36632-2_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Africa and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement: State of Play, Implementation Challenges, and Policy Recommendations in the Digital Era

In: Fostering Trade in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mena Hassan

    (Trade Policy Analyst, World Trade Organization (WTO))

Abstract

It is becoming more evident that better market access conditions alone do not translate directly into increased trade opportunities for African countries. A greater obstacle than tariffs is the high cost of moving goods across Africa’s borders. In addition to supply-side capacity constraints, behind the border barriers and non-tariff measures (NTMs) are increasingly hampering African trade, whose share in world merchandise trade remains a measly 2.7% in 2018. With the aim of lowering transaction costs for businesses and to help expedite the clearance and release of goods across borders, in 2013, Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have successfully concluded a new multilateral Agreement on Trade Facilitation, the first since the Uruguay Round twenty years before. The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) entered into force in February 2017, with over two-thirds of the membership ratifying the Agreement. On September 1, 2019, there are 35 African countries out of 41 who have ratified the TFA. According to the OECD and WTO, estimates show that the full implementation of the TFA could reduce trade costs by an average of 14.3% and boost global trade by up to US$ 1 trillion per year, with the biggest gains in the poorest countries. While there are benefits for African countries to implement the TFA sooner rather than later, many will require substantial technical assistance and capacity building (TACB) support to properly implement the trade facilitation measures in the TFA. Equally as important, the need for African policymakers is to recognize the political economy aspects of the implementation challenges, which are intertwined in trade facilitation domestic reform. This chapter will first address some of the key challenges facing African countries’ trade potential and the benefits accruing from facilitating their trade. Then, a brief description of the TFA and its novel provisions will be outlined as well as the status of implementation of African countries. Finally, the constraints related to the implementation of trade facilitation measures are addressed and in conclusion, some policy recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mena Hassan, 2020. "Africa and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement: State of Play, Implementation Challenges, and Policy Recommendations in the Digital Era," Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, in: Gbadebo O.A. Odularu & Mena Hassan & Musibau Adetunji Babatunde (ed.), Fostering Trade in Africa, pages 5-38, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-030-36632-2_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36632-2_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahrzad Safaeimanesh & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2020. "Trade Facilitation and Its Impacts on the Economic Welfare and Sustainable Development of the ECOWAS Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Huw Lloyd-Ellis & Ardyn Nordstrom, 2021. "Trade, poverty and food security: A survey of recent research and its implications for East Africa," Working Paper 1460, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    3. Glenn Jenkins & Shahrzad Safaeimanesh, 2021. "Estimation of the Potential Economic Welfare Gains to SACU from Trade Facilitation," Working Paper 1462, Economics Department, Queen's University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aaechp:978-3-030-36632-2_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.